About the area of activity

Public Audit - logo
The National Audit Office carry out public audits in implementing the tasks entrusted to it.

Public audit is an independent and objective assessment carried out by the Supreme Audit Institution in audited entities.

The National Audit Office carry out three types of public audit:

  • Financial audit – where the National Audit Office assess the data in the audited entity's annual (consolidated) financial statements and budget execution reports and issues an independent auditor‘s opinion.
  • Performance audit – where the activities of the audited entity are assessed in terms of economy, efficiency and effectiveness.
  • Compliance audit – where it assesses the compliance of the audited entity's activities with legal and/or other requirements and may express an independent auditor's opinion.

In order to improve the performance of the audited entity(ies) and to increase the benefits to society, the results of the public audits are used to formulate proposals - recommendations to address problems identified during the audit. Public audits are an important factor in promoting the efficiency, accountability and effectiveness of public sector institutions and improving the lives of citizens.
   

DOCUMENTS PROVIDING GUIDANCE TO PUBLIC AUDITING

Professional standards and guidelines are essential to ensure the reliability, quality and professionalism of public sector audit. The National Audit Office carry out audits in accordance with the INTOSAI Framework of Professional Pronouncements consisting of the INTOSAI Principles (INTOSAI-P), the International Standards of Supreme Audit Institutions (ISSAIs) and Guidelines (GUID). Financial audits are also guided by the International Standards on Auditing (ISAs) issued by the International Auditing and Assurance Standards Board of the International Federation of Accountants, which are incorporated into INTOSAI's Standards on Financial Auditing (ISSAIs 2000-2899).

In accordance with the requirements of the ISSAIs, ISAs (in the case of financial audits) and INTOSAI Guidelines, the National Audit Office has developed manuals on Financial, Performance, Compliance and Information Technology audits. The Information Technology Audit Manual also takes into account the Information Systems Audit Standards and Guidelines of the International Information Systems Audit and Control Association (ISACA), as well as other ISACA methodological material. The objective of the audit guidance documents prepared by the National Audit Office is to provide and explain the general and procedural requirements for audits in order to ensure the audit quality.

 
AUDITOR’S RESPONSIBILITY IN PERFORMING FINANCIAL AUDIT

Illustration: Auditor’s responsibility for financial audits

By conducting audits in accordance with International Standards on Auditing and International Standards of Supreme Audit Institutions, we use professional judgement and professional scepticism throughout the audit. We also:

  • Identify and assess the risks of material misstatement of the (consolidated) financial and budget implementation accounts, whether due to fraud or error, design and perform procedures in response to those risks, and obtain sufficient appropriate audit evidence to provide a basis for our opinion. Detection risk of a material misstatement due to fraud is greater than detection risk of a material misstatement due to error, as fraud may include deception, forgery, intentional omission, misinterpretation, or override of internal controls;
  • assess the internal control of the entities/group of entities involved in an audit to design audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the entity's/group of entities' internal control;
  • assess the appropriateness of accounting policies used and the reasonableness of accounting estimates and related management disclosures;
  • assess the overall presentation, structure and content, including disclosures, of the (consolidated) financial statements and the budget implementation reports and whether they present the underlying transactions and events in a manner that is consistent with the concept of fair presentation.

As part of our group audit, we also obtain sufficient appropriate audit evidence about the financial information or activities of the entities within the group to enable us to express an opinion on the group's consolidated financial statements and budget implementation reports. We are responsible for directing, supervising and performing the group audit. We are solely responsible for expressing our opinion on the audit.

We communicate to those charged with governance, among other things, the scope and timing of the audit and significant audit observations, including significant deficiencies in internal control that we identify in the course of the audit.

Among the matters that we communicate to those charged with governance, we highlight those that were the most significant in the financial audit for the current period and are considered to be key audit matters. We describe such matters in the report if we are not prohibited by law or regulation from disclosing the matter publicly or if, in very limited circumstances, we determine that the matter should not be disclosed because the adverse consequences of disclosure might reasonably be expected to outweigh the benefits to the public.

PLANNING OF PUBLIC AUDIT

Illustration: Planning of public audit

In order to implement the tasks assigned to it, the National Audit Office determine each year the scope of activities in the Annual Activity Plan.

The Institution is independent in deciding which audits or assessments are carried out, and only the Seimas, by its resolution, may assign the National Audit Office to carry out public audit within the scope of its competence.

The institution’s Annual Activity Plan is drawn up in such a way to cover the most important areas of public sector activities and to carryout all public audits and assessments assigned to the National Audit Office by laws and other legal acts. The Annual Activity Plan is approved by the Auditor General after it has been presented to the Seimas Committee on Audit.

 
PUBLIC AUDIT RECOMMENDATIONS

Illustration: Public audit recommendations

In order to maximise the impact of public audits and positive developments in the public sector, public audit recommendations are provided during each audit. Taking into account the extent of changes for the implementation of goals of state policy, public governance and society, they are marked as high, medium and low importance. Recommendations are the possibility of the National Audit Office as the supreme audit institution to initiate processes of improvement of the activities of public sector institutions, increase the value of the public sector to society and benefit to the State.

For the implementation of the recommendations and for monitoring their implementation, each time a plan of implementation of recommendations is being prepared and coordinated with the audited entity, which is part of the public audit report. The plan specifies the changes sought by the implementation of the recommendations, their evaluation indicators and values, the deadlines for the implementation of the recommendations and the measures proposed by the audited entity implementing the recommendations, and other important information. The audited entity informs the National Audit Office of the results of the implementation of the recommendations within the deadlines agreed in the plan of implementation of recommendations.

In order to strengthen the impact of the audit on public finance management and control systems and on the improvement of public administration in audited areas, the National Audit Office carries out regular monitoring of the implementation of recommendations. The results of this monitoring: the status of implementation of the recommendations, the responsible entities and the changes that have taken place following the implementation of the recommendations can be followed in Lithuanian in continuously updated open data on the institution’s website. Twice a year, before the spring and autumn sessions of the Seimas of the Republic of Lithuania, the National Audit Office submits reports on the monitoring of the implementation of the recommendations to the Seimas Committee on Audit. The reports review the status of implementation of the audit recommendations of high importance for the past half-year, draw attention to the problems observed when implementing the recommendations, identify a list of laws necessary to implement the recommendations and achieve the impact of the audit. These reports are available on the website of the National Audit Office.

 
COOPERATION

Cooperation icon

When implementing its functions, the National Audit Office cooperates with many institutions, including the Office of the President, Seimas, Government, the Association of Municipal Controllers as well as directly with public sector institutions as present or former audited entities. Cooperation of the National Audit Office with the Seimas is very important in making a positive and effective impact of public audit on public finance and asset management and control system. When exercising parliamentary scrutiny of the executive, the Seimas uses the results of the public audit as one of the parts of the system of parliamentary scrutiny and seek that the entities in which the National Audit Office has carried out public audit implement public audit recommendations. The National Audit Office cooperates most intensively with the Seimas Committee on Audit, which regularly considers public audit reports. Depending on the area audited, audit reports (as well as other products produced in implementing other functions of the institution) are submitted for consideration to other committees and commissions of the Seimas.

To implement advanced methods of budgetary governance and internal control in the public sector close cooperation is maintained with the Ministry of Finance, the Association of Internal Auditors, the Association of Municipal Controllers, municipal control and audit services, the Lithuanian Chamber of Auditors in improving the audit and accounting legislation, public sector audit methodologies, and sharing experience.

The National Audit Office has concluded cooperation agreements with the Bank of Lithuania, the Chief Official Ethics Commission, the Prosecutor General’s Office, the Public Procurement Office, the Special Investigation Service, the Financial Crime Investigation Service, the State Tax Inspectorate, the Competition Council, the Ministry of Finance, the Ministry of Social Security and Labour, the Faculty of Economics and Business Administration of Vilnius University, Vytautas Magnus University, Mykolas Romeris University, Lithuanian Chamber of Auditors, the Association of Municipal Controllers, the Association of Internal Auditors.

The National Audit Office also co-operates with various institutions when submitting conclusions, comments and proposals concerning drafts of laws and other legal acts, considers and prepares conclusions regarding draft decisions of the Government.

The National Audit Office maintains collegiate relations with the academic community: representatives of the institution are regularly invited to give lectures to students of higher education institutions, students of general education schools come to get acquainted with the activities of the institution.

The Institution also invites the general public to cooperate; when annually drawing up a public audit programme and deciding which audit topics to choose, the National Audit Office addresses the public by proposing to contribute to the development of the public audit programme in a specially designed tool for this purpose on the website where it is possible to indicate noticeable public sector failures that the National Audit Office could assess during the audit. Proposals of citizens are evaluated and taken into account when choosing directions and topics of public audit.

The National Audit Office also liaise with its peers in foreign countries – other supreme audit institutions. One of the most important expressions of this cooperation is the cooperative international audit. National Audit Office is an active member of the International Organisation of Supreme Audit Institutions INTOSAI and the European Organisation of Supreme Audit Institutions EUROSAI, participates in the work of committees and working groups of these international organisations. Read more about this cooperation in the section Internationality.

Read more

News

Picture for Before spending millions on renovating public buildings, the state must assess its actual property needsLithuania has committed to renovating more than 2 million square metres of public buildings by 2030, which may require a further EUR 681 million. However, the National Audit Office’s audit, “Improving the Energy Efficiency of Public buildings”, shows that before allocating the millions needed for renovation, a simpler question must be answered: do the state and municipalities need all the buildings in which they plan to invest?
  
The audit found that the renovation of public buildings is not sufficiently linked to the management of state-owned property. Most state property managers do not systematically assess how much property they need to carry our their functions. This creates a risk of investing in buildings that may be disposed of in the long term.
  
In 2024, the state owned 9.02 million square metres of property – more than 25,000 objects. Although its total area decreased by 8.4 percent between 2020 and 2024, maintenance costs doubled over the same period – from EUR 176 million to EUR 354 million per year.
  
“Renovating a building that the state will not need in the long run is not cost-effective. This involves not only investment in its renovation, but also ongoing costs for heating and maintenance. This is public money, which must be invested where it creates long-term value. Therefore, before allocating hundreds of millions of euros to renovation, we must assess how much property we hold that is not essential for the provision of public services, dispose of it, and invest only in what is truly necessary,” says Auditor General Irena Segalovičienė.
  
Before allocating millions to the renovation of public buildings, it is essential to assess which property the state actually needs
  
Lithuania has committed to renovating at least 3 percent of the designated floor area of public buildings each year – a target set out in the Energy Efficiency Directive. By 2030, the plan is to renovate nearly 2.2 million square metres, but between 2021 and 2025 only about a fifth – 436,000 square metres – was renovated. Taking into account projects already underway and the funding planned for 2026–2027, around 970,000 square metres of public building floor area would be renovated by 2030. The investment required to renovate the remaining 1.2 million square metres could amount to around EUR 681 million.
  
When planning future investments, it is important to regularly assess whether the available area meets the institutions’ needs, how efficiently it is being used, and which part of the property could be disposed of.
  
However, such a systematic assessment is only ensured for state-owned property managed centrally. The Turto Bankas (Property Bank), which centrally manages state-owned property, currently manages only 7.9 percent of all state-owned property. Ministries, their subordinate institutions and other state property managers do not systematically assess how much property they require and how efficiently it is being used. Consequently, before investing in the renovation of a building, it is not always assessed whether this property will be required by the state in the long term.
  
One of the most important projects for optimising state-owned property is the redevelopment of the Goštautas quarter in Vilnius into a centralised campus for state institutions. The plan was to bring state institutions together in one place, make more efficient use of administrative area, and dispose of some of the energy-inefficient and costly-to-maintain buildings. However, at the time of the audit, a final decision on the implementation of the entire project has not yet been taken.
  
The National Audit Office proposes reducing the total area of state-owned property
 
The National Audit Office recommends that the Government set out specific measures to reduce the total area of state-owned property and to manage the majority of it centrally, and that it implements these measures. To this end, it is first necessary to systematically assess how much and what type of property state institutions actually need to carry out their functions, and how efficiently it is being used. This would enable a better assessment of state institutions’ property requirements and the systematic disposal of buildings that are no longer necessary for the execution of their functions.
  
A smaller area of managed property would mean lower costs for heating, maintenance and repairs. At the same time, the area of buildings requiring renovation in the future would be reduced, as would the need for the necessary investment.

Picture for Policies on active ageing must not be aimed solely at the most active older peopleInternational Day of Older Persons, Senior Learners Day, celebrated on 1 October, serves as a reminder that learning knows no age limits. However, an audit carried out by the National Audit Office entitled "Promoting Active Ageing" revealed that opportunities for older people to engage in lifelong learning in Lithuania remain limited and uneven. In 2024, only 2.7 percent of people aged 65–74 were in education, compared with 9.8 per cent in the 25–64 age group.
  
“Lifelong learning is far more than just a meaningful leisure activity or acquiring new knowledge. It is a direct means for people to remain active, strengthen their independence and, if they so wish, stay in the labour market for longer. At the same time, it is a powerful antidote to the problem of loneliness among older people. Audit data reveals that as many as 35 percent of older people in the country feel lonely, yet this risk remains overlooked in government strategies. It is therefore important that learning opportunities are available not only to the most active and motivated, but to all older people, regardless of their age, place of residence or circumstances,” says Auditor General Irena Segalovičienė.
  
Learning opportunities are not the same for everyone
  
According to the audit findings, people aged 65 and over are currently unable to access the EUR 500 state-funded learning voucher under the "Kursuok" individual learning account system. Of the 15,300 training contracts concluded last year, residents aged 65 and over were only able to access training by paying for it themselves.
  
According to OECD data, less than 20 percent of Lithuanian residents aged 50 and over take part in training, while the European Union (EU) average stands at 34 percent. The gap between younger and older people’s participation in training is one of the widest in the EU.
  
Access to learning is heavily influenced by geographical location. Analyses of the learning needs of older people are carried out extremely rarely in municipalities – during the audit, only 5 out of 60 municipalities provided documents relating to adult learning surveys, and the needs of older residents were assessed in just two of them.
  
Universities of the Third Age (U3A) play an important role in the education of older people; between 0.1 percent and 9.1 percent of older people in different municipalities participate in their activities. U3As offer activities relating to health, culture and psychological wellbeing, while digital and financial literacy remain among the least developed areas.
  
Furthermore, as many as 67 percent of U3As stated that, due to insufficient long-term funding, they lack the resources to invite lecturers and ensure the availability of suitable premises and equipment, particularly in rural areas. Consequently, some older people are unable to take part in training; the services mainly reach the most active, motivated and educated individuals, while socially isolated and less active groups remain unreached.
  
There is also a project aimed at people aged 65 and over, entitled "Expanding Learning Opportunities for Older People", but the training is available only to members of the U3A, not to all older people. The scope of the training is limited, as only up to 5 percent of all U3A members can take part.
  
What would the implementation of the recommendations change?
  
The National Audit Office has recommended that the Ministry of Education, Science and Sport (MESS) create more favourable conditions for older people to participate in education and training activities. Among the proposed changes are the removal of age restrictions for people aged 65 and over wishing to receive funding for training through "Kursuok", giving priority within the system to learning programmes tailored to active ageing; and changing the funding model for U3A and other providers of non-formal adult education from a project-based approach to an individual learning voucher scheme. It was also recommended that older people be better informed about learning opportunities and their benefits.
  
Once these changes have been implemented, older people would be better placed to choose learning opportunities tailored to their needs, while learning opportunities could be geared more towards not only the number of participants, but also the benefits that the knowledge and skills acquired bring to individuals in their daily lives, community activities or the labour market.
  
According to the Ministry of Education, Science and Sport, some of the recommendations regarding the identification of priority areas for promoting active ageing within the "Kursuok" system and the creation of an individual learning voucher model cannot currently be implemented due to the need for additional funding. Furthermore, the Ministry does not commit to achieving measurable results in raising older people’s awareness of education and learning opportunities and the benefits they bring to their activity levels, emotional well-being and health.

Picture for sponsible decisions regarding state reserves and energyOver the next six months, 23 high importance recommendations from the National Audit Office should be implemented on time. Their implementation should help to address issues relating to the accessibility and quality of services provided to the public, the planning of government activities, public sector management, security and other important matters.
  
Among the most important expected changes are decisions that will have a significant impact on the state’s long-term financial and energy resilience: aligning the new National Progress Plan with the state’s financial capabilities; the accumulation and management of state reserves based on clear principles; and a data-driven decision on the further implementation of the First Offshore Wind Farm project.
  
“A state’s resilience does not emerge in the heat of a crisis – it is built in advance, through a precise assessment of risks and the accumulation of sustainable reserves. Today, any delayed or indecisive action in the event of a crisis would inevitably lead to our country’s vulnerability. We cannot afford to waste time, so public sector leadership that genuinely strengthens the state’s resilience must be a priority for the next six months,” says Auditor General Irena Segalovičienė.
  
The objectives of the National Progress Plan must be aligned with the state’s financial capabilities
  
One of the most significant expected changes is the new National Progress Plan for 2028–2034, which will be more focused on the country’s key changes, reforms and areas of breakthrough, channelling the necessary institutional efforts and funding towards them.
  
The 2026 autumn report on the implementation of recommendations, prepared by the National Audit Office, emphasises that such planning would allow for more efficient planning and use of state resources, a focus on results, and a more consistent assessment of the progress achieved.
  
State reserves must be managed in accordance with clear principles and long-term planning
  
Equally important for the state’s long-term resilience is the accumulation and use of financial reserves, which help the state to remain resilient in the face of economic, geopolitical and other shocks. The report emphasises the need to clearly define what level of reserves is sufficient, which risks they are intended to cushion, and how they should be built up in the long term.
  
The planning of financial reserves must be based on risk analysis, clear sources of funding and priorities for their use. The Ministry of Finance has informed the National Audit Office that an analysis of international practice has already been carried out and that proposals are being drawn up for a new model for the formation and management of financial reserves.
  
The planning of the state reserve’s material resources is also of particular importance. To ensure that supplies reach the population in a timely manner should the need arise, a coherent, risk-based system for the planning and formation of the state reserve must be established. To this end, the most cost-effective method of stockpiling food supplies must be identified, reserve prices set, suppliers’ capacities assessed, and other conditions necessary for the proper formation of the state reserve evaluated. The formation of the state reserve must also be coordinated with mobilisation and military defence requirements, involving the Ministry of National Defence in this process.
  
A final decision is needed on the offshore wind farm
  
The implementation of the Cronian Nord project, the First Offshore Wind Farm, has now been transferred to UAB Offshore Wind Farm 1 – the necessary rights and obligations have been assigned to it, thereby clarifying responsibility for the project’s progress.
  
UAB Ignitis Renewables, with the assistance of external experts, has carried out an analysis of the project’s internal and external factors and assessed the main risks and implementation scenarios. However, no specific decision has yet been taken regarding the project’s continuation or its realistic timelines. A data-driven decision on the further implementation of the Curonian Nord First Offshore Wind Farm project is therefore expected within the next six months.
  
The National Audit Office monitors the implementation of recommendations on an ongoing basis and actively cooperates with the audited entities following the audit. Up-to-date information on the status of the implementation of recommendations is published on the National Audit Office’s website: Open Data | National Audit Office of the Republic of Lithuania. A report on the status of the implementation of recommendations is published and submitted to the Seimas twice a year – in March and September. What changes are taking place in Lithuania and where risks arise, based on data collected by the National Audit Office, can also be monitored using the tool Public Sector Progress and Risk Dashboard.